Status:
Photo program
downloaded – CHECK
Of course, it didn’t load in the way
it said it would – I’m beginning to get used to that!
Camera manual
downloaded – CHECK
Remember when they used to give you an
actual manual – or are you too young for that!
Manual? Totally unhelpful after a quick review.
Photos taken
and uploaded to photo program - CHECK
Well, I’m not at all impressed with
the photo program, seems it does less than the Kodak does.
Plus when I downloaded it every photo
in my computer went into it – didn’t see that coming!
Thankfully there is still a way for
things to go into my Kodak program, or I would have been toast.
Perhaps
because I have broken this new camera process down into small parts spread over
several days, I didn’t feel too panicky or upset or frustrated. Of course, it could also be due to the fact
that I no longer assume things will load as stated in the instructions - I now
know THEY NEVER DO in my computer world!
And since the process was broken down in between things that I actually CAN
do – like paint, read, cook, fill dishwasher and do laundry – I didn’t feel
constantly stupid.
I have now used
both cameras to shoot the same objects and see which photos look the best. I thought – “wow - wouldn’t I be surprised
to find the Kodak out performing the Sony!”
Here goes –
you be the judge!
These first
two are full zoom. The Sony is on top. (I know, stupid photos, but just something
so I can use the camera - I’ll delete them – these ain’t paintin’ pitchers!)
| Full zoom (Sony) - we get the cow heads! |
![]() |
| Full Zoom (Kodak) - we get cow butts! |
These are
both taken with the lens at no zoom, again Sony on top. Both were taken into the sun and through the dining room door - not the best conditions.
| I think there is a bit more definition with the cattle. |
![]() |
| This one (Kodak) seems a bit more blue- ish. |
So, the
verdict is that the Sony will obviously take better photos, but I will have to
figure out how to get them resized and cropped.
I will have to gradually take time to look into the Sony program, it’s
not making sense and seems it doesn’t do as much as the Kodak program does - maybe
I’m missing something. I want to be able
to take photos of my paintings for shows, and want to be able to crop them so I
can clean up the edges. I also need to
be able to resize them for these blog posts!
Jeesh – seems
like the more the “improve” things, the worse they get – or is it just me???
Wish me luck.
PS – I just realized that there is a way on the
camera itself to change the resolutions – to take photos for the web which is
what I had put some of the photos on (accidentally while messing with the menu
function) – and high resolution. Soooooo
– now I know that little bit of information.
Learning through trial and error, here in the computer age! But it means I’ll be re-taking a couple of
photos for show entries – yippee.
Also, I find it odd that I can’t change the size
once the photos are taken – unless I’ll learn that later. In other words, you
have to know when you take the photo whether it’s something you want to keep in
low resolution, such as a blog photo, or high resolution for a show entry –
hmmmmmm – there’s probably a way to change this in the camera, it’s just taking
me a while to find it.
I feel like I’m back in school – most likely in
math or science class – totally clueless and probably daydreaming about some
boy . . . .


I hope you and your new camera become good friends. There are things that my camera does that I still do not understand and I have had it for years. In fact I am sure that the person writing the manual probably never saw or used the camera.
ReplyDeleteSony is giving sharper images without the bluish cast.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Vicki, they are all too complicated now, but for my purposes, they're fine.
My days of printing photos for artistic merit are pretty much in the past.