Status:
Photo program
downloaded – CHECK
Of course, it didn’t load in the way
it said it would – I’m beginning to get used to that!
Camera manual
downloaded – CHECK
Remember when they used to give you an
actual manual – or are you too young for that!
Manual? Totally unhelpful after a quick review.
Photos taken
and uploaded to photo program - CHECK
Well, I’m not at all impressed with
the photo program, seems it does less than the Kodak does.
Plus when I downloaded it every photo
in my computer went into it – didn’t see that coming!
Thankfully there is still a way for
things to go into my Kodak program, or I would have been toast.
Perhaps
because I have broken this new camera process down into small parts spread over
several days, I didn’t feel too panicky or upset or frustrated. Of course, it could also be due to the fact
that I no longer assume things will load as stated in the instructions - I now
know THEY NEVER DO in my computer world!
And since the process was broken down in between things that I actually CAN
do – like paint, read, cook, fill dishwasher and do laundry – I didn’t feel
constantly stupid.
I have now used
both cameras to shoot the same objects and see which photos look the best. I thought – “wow - wouldn’t I be surprised
to find the Kodak out performing the Sony!”
Here goes –
you be the judge!
These first
two are full zoom. The Sony is on top. (I know, stupid photos, but just something
so I can use the camera - I’ll delete them – these ain’t paintin’ pitchers!)
Full zoom (Sony) - we get the cow heads! |
Full Zoom (Kodak) - we get cow butts! |
These are
both taken with the lens at no zoom, again Sony on top. Both were taken into the sun and through the dining room door - not the best conditions.
I think there is a bit more definition with the cattle. |
This one (Kodak) seems a bit more blue- ish. |
So, the
verdict is that the Sony will obviously take better photos, but I will have to
figure out how to get them resized and cropped.
I will have to gradually take time to look into the Sony program, it’s
not making sense and seems it doesn’t do as much as the Kodak program does - maybe
I’m missing something. I want to be able
to take photos of my paintings for shows, and want to be able to crop them so I
can clean up the edges. I also need to
be able to resize them for these blog posts!
Jeesh – seems
like the more the “improve” things, the worse they get – or is it just me???
Wish me luck.
PS – I just realized that there is a way on the
camera itself to change the resolutions – to take photos for the web which is
what I had put some of the photos on (accidentally while messing with the menu
function) – and high resolution. Soooooo
– now I know that little bit of information.
Learning through trial and error, here in the computer age! But it means I’ll be re-taking a couple of
photos for show entries – yippee.
Also, I find it odd that I can’t change the size
once the photos are taken – unless I’ll learn that later. In other words, you
have to know when you take the photo whether it’s something you want to keep in
low resolution, such as a blog photo, or high resolution for a show entry –
hmmmmmm – there’s probably a way to change this in the camera, it’s just taking
me a while to find it.
I feel like I’m back in school – most likely in
math or science class – totally clueless and probably daydreaming about some
boy . . . .
2 comments:
I hope you and your new camera become good friends. There are things that my camera does that I still do not understand and I have had it for years. In fact I am sure that the person writing the manual probably never saw or used the camera.
Sony is giving sharper images without the bluish cast.
I agree with Vicki, they are all too complicated now, but for my purposes, they're fine.
My days of printing photos for artistic merit are pretty much in the past.
Post a Comment